This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0381
Case T-381/16: Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — Düll v EUIPO — Cognitect (DaToMo) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-381/16: Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — Düll v EUIPO — Cognitect (DaToMo) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-381/16: Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — Düll v EUIPO — Cognitect (DaToMo) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 195, 19.6.2017, p. 28–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 17/03/2017
- Date lodged:
- 13/07/2016
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62016TO0381
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
19.6.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 195/28 |
Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — Düll v EUIPO — Cognitect (DaToMo)
(Case T-381/16) (1)
((EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 195/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Klaus Düll (Südergellersen, Germany) (represented by: S. Wolff-Marting, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cognitect, Inc. (Durham, North Carolina, United States)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 April 2016 (Joined Cases R 1383/2015-2 and R 1481/2015-2), concerning cancellation proceedings between Cognitect, Inc. and Klaus Düll.
Operative part of the order
|
1) |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2) |
Klaus Düll and Cognitect, Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
