Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015TN0703

    Case T-703/15: Action brought on 30 November 2015 — Groupe Go Sport v OHIM — Design Go (GO SPORT)

    OJ C 48, 8.2.2016, p. 86–87 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    30/11/2015
    Date lodged:
    30/11/2015
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    8.2.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 48/86

    Action brought on 30 November 2015 — Groupe Go Sport v OHIM — Design Go (GO SPORT)

    (Case T-703/15)

    (2016/C 048/95)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Groupe Go Sport (Sassenage, France) (represented by: G. Arbant and E. Henry-Mayer, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Design Go Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘GO SPORT’ — Community trade mark application No 5 144 811

    Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 September 2015 in Case R 569/2015-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    declare admissible the Appeal R 569/2015-2;

    —

    return the case to the Board of Appeal;

    —

    order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the Applicant.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 60 of Regulation No 207/2009;

    —

    Infringement of Article 49(1) of Regulation No 2868/95.
    Top