Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015TN0578

    Case T-578/15: Action brought on 30 September 2015 — Azur Space Solar Power v OHIM (Representation of a solar cell)

    OJ C 414, 14.12.2015, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    30/09/2015
    Date lodged:
    30/09/2015
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    14.12.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 414/33

    Action brought on 30 September 2015 — Azur Space Solar Power v OHIM (Representation of a solar cell)

    (Case T-578/15)

    (2015/C 414/43)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Azur Space Solar Power GmbH (Heilbronn, Germany) (represented by: J. Nicodemus, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of a figurative mark (Representation of a solar cell) — International registration No 1 201 973

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 July 2015 in Case R 2780/2014-4

    Forms of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the refusal of OHIM;

    —

    order OHIM to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top