This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015FB0045
Case F-45/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 December 2015 — Van der Veen v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Member of the temporary staff — Decision 2009/371/JHA — Europol’s refusal to sign a contract for an indefinite period — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-45/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 December 2015 — Van der Veen v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Member of the temporary staff — Decision 2009/371/JHA — Europol’s refusal to sign a contract for an indefinite period — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-45/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 December 2015 — Van der Veen v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Member of the temporary staff — Decision 2009/371/JHA — Europol’s refusal to sign a contract for an indefinite period — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly inadmissible)
OJ C 48, 8.2.2016, p. 101–101
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 09/12/2015
- Date lodged:
- 19/03/2015
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Staff cases - inadmissible
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62015FO0045
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
8.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 48/101 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 December 2015 — Van der Veen v Europol
(Case F-45/15) (1)
((Civil Service - Europol staff - Member of the temporary staff - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Europol’s refusal to sign a contract for an indefinite period - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly inadmissible))
(2016/C 048/117)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Mark Van der Veen (The Hague, the Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: D. Neumann, J. Arnould and C. Falmagne, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the defendant’s implied decision not to follow up the applicant’s request for a contract for an indefinite period.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Mr Van der Veen shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office. |
(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015, p. 34.
