This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0394
Case C-394/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by John Dalli against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 May 2015 in Case T-562/12: John Dalli v European Commission
Case C-394/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by John Dalli against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 May 2015 in Case T-562/12: John Dalli v European Commission
Case C-394/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by John Dalli against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 May 2015 in Case T-562/12: John Dalli v European Commission
OJ C 311, 21.9.2015, p. 43–43
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 21/07/2015
- Date lodged:
- 21/07/2015
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment, Appeal
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Request to review the judgment 62012TJ0562
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
21.9.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 311/43 |
Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by John Dalli against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 May 2015 in Case T-562/12: John Dalli v European Commission
(Case C-394/15 P)
(2015/C 311/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: John Dalli (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The Appellant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
declare his appeal admissible; |
|
— |
annul the contested judgment; |
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order compensation for damage of 1 symbolic euro for non-material damage and, on a provisional basis, of EUR 1 9 13 396 for material damage; |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of his appeal, the Appellant raises:
|
— |
a first plea in law, alleging that the General Court ruled ultra petita by changing the subject-matter of the dispute; |
|
— |
a second plea in law, alleging a failure to provide reasons; |
|
— |
a third plea in law, alleging a breach of procedure which adversely affects the interests of the Appellant, including his rights of defence; |
|
— |
a fourth plea in law, raising several distortions of facts and evidence; and |
|
— |
a fifth plea in law, challenging the interpretation or application of European Union law by the General Court. |
