Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014TN0752

    Case T-752/14: Action brought on 12 November 2014  — Comber v Commission

    OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 39–39 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    12/11/2014
    Date lodged:
    12/11/2014
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    2.2.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 34/39

    Action brought on 12 November 2014 — Comber v Commission

    (Case T-752/14)

    (2015/C 034/46)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Comber SA (Lausanne, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Heel, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the Commission Decision of 16 July 2014 (REM 05/2013) on the refusal of the application for remission of import duties amounting to EUR 4 61  415,12;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant submits that the post-clearance customs duties for the import of linen fabric from Latvia in the years 1999 to 2002 must be remitted in accordance with Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) due to the presence of special circumstances. The applicant cites as special circumstances serious breaches of obligations by the Latvian customs authorities, serious breaches of obligations by the European Commission/OLAF and serious misconduct of the German customs authorities. In the applicant’s view, those circumstances cannot be attributed to obvious negligence on its part.

    Top