Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62014TN0728

Case T-728/14: Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)

OJ C 431, 1.12.2014, p. 44–45 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
10/10/2014
Date lodged:
10/10/2014
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
English
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

1.12.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/44

Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)

(Case T-728/14)

(2014/C 431/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition (New Brunswick, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H. Young Holdings plc (Newbury, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘animal’ — Community trade mark No 2 8 24  548

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 July 2014 in Case R 2058/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95.
Top