This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CN0395
Case C-395/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2014 — Vodafone GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
Case C-395/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2014 — Vodafone GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
Case C-395/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2014 — Vodafone GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
OJ C 372, 20.10.2014, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
20.10.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 372/12 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2014 — Vodafone GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-395/14)
2014/C 372/15
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesverwaltungsgericht
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Vodafone GmbH
Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany
Question referred
Is Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) to be interpreted as meaning that a national regulatory authority which has required an operator with significant market power to provide mobile call termination services and has made the fees charged for this subject to authorisation in compliance with the procedure laid down in the aforementioned provision of the directive is required to carry out the procedure under Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC again before each authorisation of fees specifically requested?