This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0043
Case T-43/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-43/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-43/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons)
OJ C 48, 8.2.2016, p. 35–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 48/35 |
Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission
(Case T-43/11) (1)
((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European airfreight market - Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) - Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport - Obligation to state reasons))
(2016/C 048/39)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Singapore Airlines Ltd (Singapore, Singapore); and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd (Singapore) (represented initially by J. Kallaugher and J. Poitras, Solicitors, J. Ruiz Calzado and É. Barbier de La Serre, lawyers, and subsequently by J. Kallaugher, J. Poitras and J. Ruiz Calzado)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by S. Noë, N. von Lingen and J. Bourke, and subsequently by S. Noë, N. von Lingen and A. Dawes, and lastly by A. Dawes, acting as Agents, and by C. Brown, Barrister)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and M. Simm, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight) in so far as it concerns the applicants and, in the alternative, for the annulment of or a reduction in the fine imposed on the applicants.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as it concerns Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd; |
2. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte; |
3. |
Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |