Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/086/50

    Case T-206/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 February 2006 — Rodrigues Carvalhais v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Figurative mark containing the verbal element PERFIX — Earlier Community figurative trade mark containing the verbal element cerfix — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

    OB C 86, 8.4.2006, p. 26–26 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.4.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 86/26


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 February 2006 — Rodrigues Carvalhais v OHIM

    (Case T-206/04) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘PERFIX’ - Earlier Community figurative trade mark containing the verbal element ‘cerfix’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

    (2006/C 86/50)

    Language of the case: Portuguese

    Parties

    Applicant: Fernando Rodrigues Carvalhais (Almada, Portugal) (represented by: P. Graça initially, then J. Lopes, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Profilpas Snc (Cadoneghe, Italy) (represented by: J.L. Revenga Santos initially, then J.M. Monravá, lawyers)

    Action

    brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 March 2004 (Case R 408/2003-1), concerning opposition proceedings between M. Fernando Rodrigues Carvalhais and Profilpas Snc

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action.

    2.

    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 217 of 28.8.2004.


    Top