This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0353
Case T-353/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KTM Fahrrad v EUIPO — KTM (R2R) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark R2R — Declaration of revocation — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Proper reason for non-use)
Case T-353/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KTM Fahrrad v EUIPO — KTM (R2R) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark R2R — Declaration of revocation — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Proper reason for non-use)
Case T-353/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KTM Fahrrad v EUIPO — KTM (R2R) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark R2R — Declaration of revocation — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Proper reason for non-use)
OJ C 418, 31.10.2022, p. 27–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
31.10.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 418/27 |
Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KTM Fahrrad v EUIPO — KTM (R2R)
(Case T-353/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark R2R - Declaration of revocation - Genuine use of the trade mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Proper reason for non-use)
(2022/C 418/35)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: KTM Fahrrad GmbH (Mattighofen, Austria) (represented by: V. Hoene, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: KTM AG (Mattighofen) (represented by: R. Erfurt, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 April 2021 (Case R 261/2020-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders KTM Fahrrad GmbH to pay the costs. |