This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0357
Case T-357/14: Action brought on 23 May 2014 — Experience Hendrix v OHIM — JH Licence (Jimi Hendrix)
Case T-357/14: Action brought on 23 May 2014 — Experience Hendrix v OHIM — JH Licence (Jimi Hendrix)
Case T-357/14: Action brought on 23 May 2014 — Experience Hendrix v OHIM — JH Licence (Jimi Hendrix)
OJ C 253, 4.8.2014, pp. 43–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
4.8.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 253/43 |
Action brought on 23 May 2014 — Experience Hendrix v OHIM — JH Licence (Jimi Hendrix)
(Case T-357/14)
2014/C 253/57
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Experience Hendrix LLC (Tukwila, USA) (represented by: M. Vanhegan, Barrister, and P. Gardiner, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: JH Licence GmbH (Pommelsbrunn, Germany)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 March 2014 in Case R 782/2012-4; |
— |
declare that the contested community trade mark is invalid; |
— |
order that the community trade mark proprietor pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Cancellation Division; |
— |
order that the defendant pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘Jimi Hendrix’ for goods and services in Classes 9 and 15 — Community trade mark registration No 4 6 26 685
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: JH Licence GmbH
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Violation of Articles 52(1)(b) and 53(2)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009
Decision of the Cancellation Division: The community trade mark was declared invalid
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The decision of the Cancellation Division was annulled and the request for declaration of invalidity rejected
Pleas in law:
— |
Violation of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
— |
Violation of Article 53(2)(a) and Article 78 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
— |
Violation of Article 53(2)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |