Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62012TN0043

    Case T-43/12: Action brought on 30 January 2012 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council

    SL C 80, 17.3.2012, p. 25–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.3.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 80/25

    Action brought on 30 January 2012 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council

    (Case T-43/12)

    2012/C 80/43

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicants: Mohamad Hamcho (Damascus, Syria) and Hamcho International (Damascus) (represented by: M. Ponsard, lawyer)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    —

    allow the present action to be dealt with under an expedited procedure;

    —

    annul, in so far as these measures relate to the applicants:

    —

    Decision 2011/273/CFSP, as supplemented and amended to date, including all the decisions cited at point 17 above;

    —

    Regulation No 442/2011, as supplemented and amended to date, including all the regulations cited at point 18 above;

    —

    Decision 2011/782/CFSP, as supplemented and amended to date, in particular by Implementing Decision 2012/37/CFSP, in accordance with point 19 above;

    —

    Regulation No 36/2012, as supplemented and amended to date, in particular by Implementing Regulation No 55/2012, in accordance with point 20 above;

    —

    annul the Council’s decision contained in its letter to the applicants of 21 December 2011, in so far as it maintains their inclusion in the lists at issue;

    —

    order the Council to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-653/11 Jaber v Council.

    Top