Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010TN0595

Case T-595/10: Action brought on 17 December 2010 — Zenato v OHIM — Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (RIPASSA)

SL C 72, 5.3.2011, p. 21–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

5.3.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/21

Action brought on 17 December 2010 — Zenato v OHIM — Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (RIPASSA)

(Case T-595/10)

2011/C 72/36

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Alberto Zenato (Verona, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

declare the present action, together with the related annexes, admissible;

—

annul the decision of the Board of Appeal in so far as it annuls the contested decision and orders the costs of the appeal proceedings to be shared;

—

uphold, in consequence, the decision of the Opposition Division;

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Alberto Zenato.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘RIPASSA’ (registration application No 106 955) for goods in Class 33.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Italian word mark ‘VINO DI RIPASSO’ (No 528 778) for goods in Class 33.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Contested decision annulled and case remitted to the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law: Infringement and misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Top