This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0286
Case T-286/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Fidelio v OHIM (Hallux) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Hallux — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-286/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Fidelio v OHIM (Hallux) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Hallux — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-286/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Fidelio v OHIM (Hallux) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Hallux — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
SL C 46, 12.2.2011, p. 9–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
12.2.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 46/9 |
Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Fidelio v OHIM (Hallux)
(Case T-286/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Hallux - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 46/13
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Fidelio KG (Linz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 632/2007-4) relating to registration of the word sign ‘Hallux’as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Fidelio KG to pay the costs. |