Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CA0167

    Case C-167/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium)) — Draka NK Cables Ltd, AB Sandvik International, VO Sembodja BV, Parc Healthcare International Ltd v Omnipol Ltd (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 43(1) — Jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments — Notion of party ))

    SL C 141, 20.6.2009, p. 18–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.6.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 141/18


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium)) — Draka NK Cables Ltd, AB Sandvik International, VO Sembodja BV, Parc Healthcare International Ltd v Omnipol Ltd

    (Case C-167/08) (1)

    (Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 43(1) - Jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments - Notion of ‘party’))

    2009/C 141/30

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Hof van Cassatie van België

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: Draka NK Cables Ltd, AB Sandvik International, VO Sembodja BV, Parc Healthcare International Ltd

    Defendant: Omnipol Ltd

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Cassatie van België — Interpretation of Article 43(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘Brussels I’) (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Notion of ‘party’ — Action brought by a creditor in the name and for the account of his debtor — Decision relating to a request for a declaration of enforceability

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 43(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that a creditor of a debtor cannot lodge an appeal against a decision on a request for a declaration of enforceability if he has not formally appeared as a party in the proceedings in which another creditor of that debtor applied for that declaration of enforceability.


    (1)  OJ C 183, 19.7.2008.


    Top