This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FA0102
Case F-102/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Kerstens v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2004, 2005 and 2006 Promotions procedures — Award of priority points — Priority points awarded by directors general — Priority points in recognition of work carried out in the interests of the institution — Principle of non-discrimination — Duty to state reasons)
Case F-102/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Kerstens v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2004, 2005 and 2006 Promotions procedures — Award of priority points — Priority points awarded by directors general — Priority points in recognition of work carried out in the interests of the institution — Principle of non-discrimination — Duty to state reasons)
Case F-102/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Kerstens v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2004, 2005 and 2006 Promotions procedures — Award of priority points — Priority points awarded by directors general — Priority points in recognition of work carried out in the interests of the institution — Principle of non-discrimination — Duty to state reasons)
SL C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 72–72
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.1.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/72 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Kerstens v Commission
(Case F-102/07) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2004, 2005 and 2006 Promotions procedures - Award of priority points - Priority points awarded by directors general - Priority points in recognition of work carried out in the interests of the institution - Principle of non-discrimination - Duty to state reasons)
2010/C 24/130
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and M. Velardo, initially, and C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, subsequently, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of various Commission decisions concerning the award to the applicant of directorate general priority points (PPDG) and/or priority points in recognition of additional tasks carried out in the interests of the institution (PPII) under the 2004, 2005 and 2006 promotion exercises.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 297, 8.12.2007, p. 49.