Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009CN0232

    Case C-232/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 25 June 2009 — Dita Danosa v LKB Līzings SIA

    SL C 220, 12.9.2009, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.9.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 220/20


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 25 June 2009 — Dita Danosa v LKB Līzings SIA

    (Case C-232/09)

    2009/C 220/37

    Language of the case: Latvian

    Referring court

    Augstākās tiesas Senāts

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Dita Danosa

    Defendant: LKB Līzings SIA

    Questions referred

    1.

    Are the members of the managerial body of a capital company to be regarded as being covered by the concept of worker laid down in Community law?

    2.

    Do Article 10 of Directive 92/85/EEC (1) and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities preclude Article 224(4) of the Komerclikums, which provides that the members of the board of directors of a capital company may be removed without any restrictions, in particular, in the case of a woman, irrespective of the fact that she is pregnant?


    (1)  Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ 1992 L 348, p. 1)


    Top