EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0004
Case T-4/16: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Rabbit v EUIPO — DMG Media (rabbit) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-4/16: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Rabbit v EUIPO — DMG Media (rabbit) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-4/16: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Rabbit v EUIPO — DMG Media (rabbit) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 305, 22.8.2016, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.8.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 305/38 |
Order of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Rabbit v EUIPO — DMG Media (rabbit)
(Case T-4/16) (1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 305/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rabbit, Inc. (Redwood City, California, United States) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister, and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O'Neill, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: DMG Media Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2015 (Case R 2133/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between DMG Media Ltd and Rabbit, Inc.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
Rabbit, Inc. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |