EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010FA0118

Case F-118/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 October 2012 — Psarras v ENISA (Civil Service — Assignment — Reassignment — Interest of the service — Leave on personal grounds)

IO C 38, 9.2.2013, p. 30–30 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.2.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/30


Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 October 2012 — Psarras v ENISA

(Case F-118/10) (1)

(Civil Service - Assignment - Reassignment - Interest of the service - Leave on personal grounds)

2013/C 38/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Aristidis Psarras (Heraklion, Greece) (represented initially by: É. Boigelot and S. Woog, lawyers, and subsequently by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Network and Information Security Agency (represented by: E. Maurage, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Civil service — Firstly, application for annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant from his duties as accountant for the Agency and to appoint another person to that post. Secondly, application for payment to the applicant of a sum by way of compensation for the loss suffered owing to the contested acts and the harassment of which he claims to have been a victim.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.

Annuls the decision of 7 February 2010 of the Board of the European Network and Information Security Agency to dismiss Mr Psarras from his duties as accountant, with immediate effect, and to appoint Mr X, budget officer, to the post as account for a unlimited term, and the decision of 1 March 2010 adopted as a consequence by the Executive Director reassigning Mr Psarras to new duties;

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

3.

Orders the European Network and Information Security Agency to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Mr Psarras.


(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011, p. 34.


Top