Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0284

    Case T-284/21: Action brought on 21 May 2021 — Pejovič v EUIPO — ETA živilska industrija (RENČKI HRAM)

    IO C 278, 12.7.2021, p. 62–63 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.7.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 278/62

    Action brought on 21 May 2021 — Pejovič v EUIPO — ETA živilska industrija (RENČKI HRAM)

    (Case T-284/21)

    (2021/C 278/85)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Edvin Pejovič (Pobegi, Slovenia) (represented by: U. Pogačnik, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ETA živilska industrija d.o.o. (Kamnik, Slovenia)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark RENČKI HRAM — European Union trade mark No 15 297 336

    Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2021 in Case R 1050/2020-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    uphold the present application;

    —

    reform the contested decision in such manner to uphold the applicant’s appeal and reform the decision issued in cancellation procedure No. 34 709 C of 12 May 2020 in such manner to uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity of the contested trade mark RENČKI HRAM and to declare the contested trade mark invalid in its entirety;

    —

    in the alternative, to annul the contested decision;

    —

    remit the case back to the EUIPO for further deliberation;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay all costs.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) Infringement of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 63(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 46(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top