This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0239
Case T-239/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Dana Astra v Council
Case T-239/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Dana Astra v Council
Case T-239/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Dana Astra v Council
IO C 242, 21.6.2021, p. 55–56
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.6.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 242/55 |
Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Dana Astra v Council
(Case T-239/21)
(2021/C 242/78)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Dana Astra IOOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Lester, G. Forwood, and M. Vangenechten, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
|
— |
Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/353 of 25 February 2021 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/339 of 25 February 2021 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) 765/2006 insofar as they apply to the Applicant; and |
|
— |
Order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Applicant. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging errors of assessment and failure to give reasons in finding that Dana Holdings/Dana Astra is benefiting from or supporting the Lukashenka regime.