This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0699
Case T-699/20: Action brought on 20 November 2020 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN)
Case T-699/20: Action brought on 20 November 2020 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN)
Case T-699/20: Action brought on 20 November 2020 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN)
IO C 28, 25.1.2021, p. 61–61
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.1.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 28/61 |
Action brought on 20 November 2020 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN)
(Case T-699/20)
(2021/C 28/90)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fashion Energy Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: T. Müller and F. Togo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Retail Royalty Co. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark 1st AMERICAN — Application for registration No 8 622 078
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 in Case R 426/2020-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
dismiss the opposition and allow the European Union trade mark application No 8 622 078 to proceed to registration; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and the other party to pay the entire costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of the duty to state reasons; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |