This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0356
Case T-356/17: Action brought on 2 June 2017 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)
Case T-356/17: Action brought on 2 June 2017 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)
Case T-356/17: Action brought on 2 June 2017 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)
IO C 239, 24.7.2017, p. 71–71
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.7.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 239/71 |
Action brought on 2 June 2017 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)
(Case T-356/17)
(2017/C 239/82)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Daico International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Kassner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: American Franchise Marketing Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘RoB’ — EU trade mark No 5 752 324
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 in Case R 1407/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark. |