Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0424

    Case T-424/17: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Fruit of the Loom v EUIPO — Takko (FRUIT) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark FRUIT — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Res judicata — Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001))

    IO C 35, 28.1.2019, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.1.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 35/22


    Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Fruit of the Loom v EUIPO — Takko (FRUIT)

    (Case T-424/17) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark FRUIT - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Res judicata - Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

    (2019/C 35/27)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Takko Holding GmbH (Telgte, Germany)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2017 (Case R 2119/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Takko Holding and Fruit of the Loom.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Fruit of the Loom, Inc. to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.


    Top