This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0714
Case T-714/16: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-714/16: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-714/16: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 121, 18.4.2017, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.4.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 121/34 |
Order of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL)
(Case T-714/16) (1)
((EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 121/51)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Asolo LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and M. Capostagno, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria) (represented by: A. Renck, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 July 2016 (Case R 282/2015-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Red Bull and Asolo.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Asolo LTD and Red Bull GmbH. |