Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TN0577

    Case T-577/10: Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission

    IO C 55, 19.2.2011, p. 29–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.2.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 55/29


    Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission

    (Case T-577/10)

    2011/C 55/52

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL (Santander, Spain) (represented by F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel);

    in the alternative, annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 2 of the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel) insofar as it entails an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination in not having extended to TYCSA PSC the additional period for payment of the fine, and fails to state reasons; and

    order the European Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are those already raised in Case T-575/10 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission.


    Top