This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0125
Case T-125/10: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2011 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-125/10: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2011 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-125/10: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2011 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 238, 13.8.2011, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 238/17 |
Order of the General Court of 27 June 2011 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up)
(Case T-125/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 238/29
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Amecke Fruchtsaft GmbH & Co. KG (Menden, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase and J.-C. Plate, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner and subsequently S. Schäffner and B. Schmidt, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Beate Uhse Einzelhandels GmbH (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: W. Berlit, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2010 (Case R 612/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Beate Uhse Einzelhandels GmbH and Amecke Fruchtsaft GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate. |
|
2. |
The applicant shall pay the costs. |