Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0346

    Case T-346/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    IO C 46, 12.2.2011, p. 10–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.2.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 46/10


    Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon)

    (Case T-346/08) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    2011/C 46/17

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (Kilchberg, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Lange, E. Schalast and G. Hild, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 June 2008 (Case R 943/2007-4), concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the representation of a small bell with a red ribbon.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.


    Top