This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CN0052
Case C-52/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Ion Beregovoi
Case C-52/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Ion Beregovoi
Case C-52/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Ion Beregovoi
IO C 98, 31.3.2012, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 02/02/2012
- Date lodged:
- 02/02/2012
- Author:
- An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Iodáilis
- Type of procedure:
- Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 12010M004 Str. 03
- request for interpretation 32008L0115 airteagal 02
- request for interpretation 32008L0115 airteagal 04
- request for interpretation 32008L0115 airteagal 06
- request for interpretation 32008L0115 airteagal 07
- request for interpretation 32008L0115 airteagal 15
- request for interpretation 32008L0115 airteagal 16
- request for interpretation 32008L0115 airteagal 8
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
31.3.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 98/20 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Ion Beregovoi
(Case C-52/12)
2012/C 98/33
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Giudice di Pace di Revere
Party to the main proceedings
Ion Beregovoi
Question referred
|
1. |
In the light of the principles of sincere cooperation and the effectiveness of directives, do Articles 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8 of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) preclude the possibility that a third-country national illegally staying in a Member State may be liable to a fine, for which home detention is substituted by way of criminal-law sanction, solely as a consequence of that person’s illegal entry and stay, even before any failure to comply with a removal order issued by the administrative authorities? |
|
2. |
In the light of the principles of sincere cooperation and the effectiveness of directives, do Articles 2, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC preclude the possibility that, subsequent to the adoption of the directive, a Member State may enact legislation which provides that a third-country national illegally staying in that Member State may be liable to a fine, for which an enforceable order for expulsion with immediate effect is substituted by way of criminal-law sanction, without respecting the procedure and rights of the foreign national laid down in the directive? |
|
3. |
Does the principle of sincere cooperation established in Article 4(3) TEU preclude national rules adopted during the period prescribed for transposition of a directive in order to circumvent or, in any event, limit the scope of the directive, and what measures must the national court adopt in the event that it concludes that there was such an objective? |
