Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62009CN0485

    Case C-485/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany), lodged on 1 December 2009 — Viamex Agrar Handels GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

    IO C 37, 13.2.2010, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    01/12/2009
    Date lodged:
    01/12/2009
    Author:
    An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Gearmáinis
    Type of procedure:
    Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    13.2.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 37/20

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany), lodged on 1 December 2009 — Viamex Agrar Handels GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

    (Case C-485/09)

    2010/C 37/22

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Finanzgericht Hamburg

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Viamex Agrar Handels GmbH

    Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

    Questions referred

    1.

    Does point 48(5) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC, (1) in the version of Council Directive 95/29/EC of 29 June 1995 amending Directive 91/628/EEC on the protection of animals during transport, (2) apply to rail transport?

    2.

    In situations in which the breach of Directive 91/628/EEC has not resulted in the death of the animals, are courts generally under an obligation to examine whether the competent authority of the Member State applied Article 5(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 615/98 of 18 March 1998 laying down specific detailed rules of application for the export refund arrangements as regards the welfare of live bovine animals during transport (3) in a manner consistent with the principle of proportionality?

    (1)  OJ 1991 L 340, p. 17.

    (2)  OJ 1995 L 148, p. 52.

    (3)  OJ 1998 L 82, p. 19.

    Top