EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0340
Case T-340/16: Action brought on 28 June 2016 — Flatworld Solutions/EUIPO — Outsource2India (Outsource 2 India)
Case T-340/16: Action brought on 28 June 2016 — Flatworld Solutions/EUIPO — Outsource2India (Outsource 2 India)
Case T-340/16: Action brought on 28 June 2016 — Flatworld Solutions/EUIPO — Outsource2India (Outsource 2 India)
OJ C 305, 22.8.2016, p. 47–47
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.8.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 305/47 |
Action brought on 28 June 2016 — Flatworld Solutions/EUIPO — Outsource2India (Outsource 2 India)
(Case T-340/16)
(2016/C 305/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Flatworld Solutions Pvt. Ltd (Bangalore, India) (represented by: S. Gillert, K. Vanden Bossche, B. Köhn-Gerdes, J. Schumacher, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Outsource2India Ltd (Friedrichshafen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Outsource 2 India’ — EU trade mark No 6 035 547
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 April 2016 in Case R 611/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
|
— |
confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 3 February 2015; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs incurred by the Applicant. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |