Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TA0018

    Case T-18/22: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ v EUIPO — Newport Europe (NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ — Earlier EU word mark Newport — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    OJ C 63, 20.2.2023, p. 44–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.2.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 63/44


    Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ v EUIPO — Newport Europe (NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ)

    (Case T-18/22) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ - Earlier EU word mark Newport - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    (2023/C 63/55)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ (Izmir, Türkiye) (represented by: V. Martín Santos, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Newport Europe BV (Moerdijk, Netherlands)

    Re:

    By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 November 2021 (Case R 562/2021-4).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 November 2021 (Case R 562/2021-4);

    2.

    Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.


    Top