EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0467
Case T-467/21: Action brought on 4 August 2021 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío)
Case T-467/21: Action brought on 4 August 2021 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío)
Case T-467/21: Action brought on 4 August 2021 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío)
OJ C 382, 20.9.2021, p. 31–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.9.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 382/31 |
Action brought on 4 August 2021 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío)
(Case T-467/21)
(2021/C 382/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: DBM Videovertrieb GmbH (Wesel, Germany) (represented by: J. Fusbahn and D. Dawirs, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nube, SL (Ibiza, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Lío in golden yellow and black colour — European Union trade mark No 17 225 939
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2021 in Case R 1220/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision and, consequently, the decision of the Cancellation Division of 28 April 2020 (Invalidity No. 000025781 C); |
|
— |
reject the application for a declaration of invalidity and keep the contested trademark registration No. 17 225 939 registered; |
|
— |
decide that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the EUIPO and Nube, SL. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |