Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TA0083

    Case T-83/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2022 — Van Walle v ECDC (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — ECDC staff members — Decision not to renew a contract — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Right to be heard — Action for annulment and for damages)

    OJ C 463, 5.12.2022, p. 26–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.12.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 463/26


    Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2022 — Van Walle v ECDC

    (Case T-83/21) (1)

    (Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - ECDC staff members - Decision not to renew a contract - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Right to be heard - Action for annulment and for damages)

    (2022/C 463/35)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Ivo Van Walle (Järfälla, Sweden) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: J. Mannheim, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

    Re:

    By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in the first place, annulment of the decision of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) of 30 March 2020 not to renew his contract as a member of the temporary staff; in the second place, principally, an order that ECDC pay him retroactively the net salary of which he was deprived between the non-renewal of his contract and the date of his reinstatement and, in the alternative, an order that ECDC compensate him for the material damage that he allegedly suffered; and, in the third place, compensation for the non-material damage that he allegedly suffered following the decision not to renew his contract.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Mr Ivo Van Walle to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 48, 26.4.2021.


    Top