This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0425
Case T-425/20: Action brought on 3 July 2020 — KU v EEAS
Case T-425/20: Action brought on 3 July 2020 — KU v EEAS
Case T-425/20: Action brought on 3 July 2020 — KU v EEAS
OJ C 297, 7.9.2020, p. 43–43
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.9.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 297/43 |
Action brought on 3 July 2020 — KU v EEAS
(Case T-425/20)
(2020/C 297/56)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: KU (represented by: R. Wardyn, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision of the EEAS of 17 September 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request of assistance; |
— |
annul the decision of 3 April 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
— |
order the defendant to pay EU 15 000 as fair compensation of the harassment suffered by the applicant; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging insufficient motivation and failure to review evidence.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging an error of law: infringement of Article 12a of the Staff Regulations.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the duty to provide assistance: infringement of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations.
|