This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0043
Case T-43/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AV and AW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Downgrading — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-43/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AV and AW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Downgrading — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-43/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AV and AW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Downgrading — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 490, 6.12.2021, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.12.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 490/34 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AV and AW v Parliament
(Case T-43/20) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Downgrading - Rights of the defence - Principle of good administration - Manifest error of assessment)
(2021/C 490/37)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: AV and AW (represented by: L. Levi, S. Rodrigues and J. Martins, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Scafarto and I. Lázaro Betancor, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the Parliament’s decisions of 21 June 2019 imposing on one of the applicants a disciplinary penalty of downgrading by four grades, from AST 6 to AST 2, and, on the other applicant, a disciplinary penalty of downgrading by two grades, from AST 8 to AST 6, and, in so far as necessary, of the Parliament’s decisions of 28 November 2019 rejecting the applicants’ complaints of 17 July 2019 against the decisions of 21 June 2019.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders AV and AW to pay the costs. |