This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0646
Case T-646/19: Action brought on 26 September 2019 – eSky Group IP v EUIPO – Gröpel (e)
Case T-646/19: Action brought on 26 September 2019 – eSky Group IP v EUIPO – Gröpel (e)
Case T-646/19: Action brought on 26 September 2019 – eSky Group IP v EUIPO – Gröpel (e)
OJ C 383, 11.11.2019, p. 78–78
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 383/78 |
Action brought on 26 September 2019 – eSky Group IP v EUIPO – Gröpel (e)
(Case T-646/19)
(2019/C 383/86)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gerhard Gröpel (Straubing, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark e in colours turquoise, white, dark blue, blue and light pink – Application for registration No 16 731 333
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 in Case R 223/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
annul the decision of Opposition Division of 29 November 2018 adopted in opposition proceedings No B 2 957 168; |
|
— |
refer the case back to EUIPO; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Opposition Division, Board of Appeal and General Court. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |