Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0719

    Case C-719/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 30 September 2019 – FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

    OJ C 19, 20.1.2020, p. 10–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.1.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 19/10


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 30 September 2019 – FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

    (Case C-719/19)

    (2020/C 19/12)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Raad van State

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: FS

    Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 15(1) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEG, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158(1) corrected by OJ 2004 L 229, OJ 2005 L 30, OJ 2005 L 197and OJ 2007 L 204) be interpreted as meaning that the decision to expel a Union citizen from the territory of the host Member State taken on the basis of that provision has been complied with and that that decision no longer has any legal effects once that Union citizen has demonstrably left the territory of that host Member State within the period for voluntary departure laid down in that decision?

    2.

    If Question 1 must be answered in the affirmative, does that Union citizen, in the event of an immediate return to the host Member State, have the right of residence of up to three months referred to in Article 6(1) of Directive 2004/38/EC, or may the host Member State take a new expulsion decision in order to prevent the Union citizen from entering the host Member State for a short period of time?

    3.

    If Question 1 must be answered in the negative, must that Union citizen in that case then reside outside the territory of the host Member State for a certain period of time and, if so, how long is that period?


    (1)  p. 77.


    Top