This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0093
Case T-93/17: Action brought on 14 February 2017 — Duferco Long Products v Commission
Case T-93/17: Action brought on 14 February 2017 — Duferco Long Products v Commission
Case T-93/17: Action brought on 14 February 2017 — Duferco Long Products v Commission
OJ C 121, 18.4.2017, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
18.4.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 121/38 |
Action brought on 14 February 2017 — Duferco Long Products v Commission
(Case T-93/17)
(2017/C 121/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Duferco Long Products SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff and M. Favart, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
— |
declare the present action admissible and well founded; |
— |
annul Article 1(f) and Article 2 of the Commission decision of 20 January 2016 on the State aid SA.33926 2013/C (ex 2013/NN, 2011/CP) implemented by Belgium in favour of Duferco; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of law and appraisal on the part of the Commission in the examination of the pari passu nature of the sixth measure declared incompatible with the common market. This plea is divided into two parts.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of law and appraisal on the part of the Commission in the examination of the private investor in a market economy test. This plea is divided into four parts:
|