Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TA0294

    Case T-294/16: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2017 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MOUNT) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark GOLD MOUNT — No genuine use of the trade mark — No proper reasons for non-use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    OJ C 239, 24.7.2017, p. 46–47 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.7.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 239/46


    Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2017 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MOUNT)

    (Case T-294/16) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark GOLD MOUNT - No genuine use of the trade mark - No proper reasons for non-use - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    (2017/C 239/58)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Company FZE, formerly Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd. (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez and I. Valdelomar, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hussey, Solicitor, and B. Brandreth, Barrister)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 (Case R 1857/2015-4) relating to revocation proceedings between Global Tobacco and Kaane American International Tobacco.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Kaane American International Tobacco Company FZE to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.


    Top