Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62015CN0241

Case C-241/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi

OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

27.7.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/12

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi

(Case C-241/15)

(2015/C 245/15)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori

Party to the main proceedings

Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi

Questions referred

1)

For the purposes of the application of Article 8(1)(c) of the Framework Decision [2002/584/JHA] (1), must the expression ‘the existence of an ... arrest warrant’ be understood to refer to a national — domestic — arrest warrant issued in accordance with the criminal procedural rules of the issuing Member State, and therefore distinct from the European arrest warrant?

2)

If the first question is answered in the affirmative, may the non-existence of a national — domestic — arrest warrant constitute an implied reason for non-execution of the European arrest warrant?

(1)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

Top