EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0241
Case C-241/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
Case C-241/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
Case C-241/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.7.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 245/12 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
(Case C-241/15)
(2015/C 245/15)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori
Party to the main proceedings
Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
Questions referred
1) |
For the purposes of the application of Article 8(1)(c) of the Framework Decision [2002/584/JHA] (1), must the expression ‘the existence of an ... arrest warrant’ be understood to refer to a national — domestic — arrest warrant issued in accordance with the criminal procedural rules of the issuing Member State, and therefore distinct from the European arrest warrant? |
2) |
If the first question is answered in the affirmative, may the non-existence of a national — domestic — arrest warrant constitute an implied reason for non-execution of the European arrest warrant? |
(1) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).