This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CN0615
Case C-615/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 23 December 2010 — Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy
Case C-615/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 23 December 2010 — Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy
Case C-615/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 23 December 2010 — Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy
OJ C 72, 5.3.2011, p. 14–14
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
5.3.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 72/14 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 23 December 2010 — Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy
(Case C-615/10)
2011/C 72/23
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Korkein hallinto-oikeus
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy
Other party: Puolustusvoimat
Question referred
Is Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts applicable, having regard to Article 10 of that directive and to Article 346(1)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the list of arms, munitions and war material adopted by decision of the Council on 15 April 1958, to a procurement which otherwise falls within the scope of the directive, when according to the contracting entity the intended purpose of the object of procurement is specifically military, but there also exist largely identical technical applications of the object of procurement in the civilian market?