This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009CN0456
Case C-456/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo n o 3 de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 23 November 2009 — Ana María Iglesias Torres v Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Galicia
Case C-456/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo n o 3 de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 23 November 2009 — Ana María Iglesias Torres v Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Galicia
Case C-456/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo n o 3 de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 23 November 2009 — Ana María Iglesias Torres v Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Galicia
OJ C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.1.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/34 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo no 3 de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 23 November 2009 — Ana María Iglesias Torres v Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Galicia
(Case C-456/09)
2010/C 24/62
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo No 3 de Pontevedra
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ana María Iglesias Torres
Defendant: Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Galicia
Questions referred
1. |
Is Directive 1999/70/EC (1) applicable to interim staff of the Autonomous Community of Galicia? |
2. |
Is it possible to regard Article 25(2) of Law 7/2007 as a national provision transposing Directive 1999/70/EC when there is no reference to Community legislation in that Law? |
3. |
In the event that the reply to the second question is affirmative: must Article 25(2) EBEP be defined as a national provision transposing the directive, of the kind referred to in point 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-268/06 (Impact), (2) or is the Spanish State required to give retroactive effect to remuneration arising from the three-yearly increments which it has recognised in accordance with the Directive? |
4. |
In the event that the reply to the second question is negative: is it possible to apply Directive 1999/70/EC directly to the case in the terms set out in the judgment of the Court of Justice in Del Cerro Alonso? (3) |
(1) Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43).
(2) Case C-268/06 Impact [2008] ECR I-2483.
(3) Case C-307/05 Del Cerro Alonso [2007] ECR I-7109.