EUR-Lex Der Zugang zum EU-Recht
Dieses Dokument ist ein Auszug aus dem EUR-Lex-Portal.
Dokument 62008TA0534
Case T-534/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark GRANUflex — Previous company name and business name GRANUFLEX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-534/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark GRANUflex — Previous company name and business name GRANUFLEX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-534/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark GRANUflex — Previous company name and business name GRANUFLEX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
OJ C 317, 20.11.2010, S. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.11.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 317/28 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex)
(Case T-534/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark GRANUflex - Previous company name and business name GRANUFLEX - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 317/50
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Granuband BV (Krommenie, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ellens, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: W. Verburg, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: K. Szamosi, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2008 (Case R 1277/2007-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft and Granuband BV.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Granuband BV to pay the costs. |