Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62003TA0012

    Case T-12/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2009 — Itochu v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for video games consoles and games cartridges compatible with Nintendo games consoles — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Limitation of parallel exports — Attributability of the infringement — Fines — Differential treatment — Deterrent effect — Duration of the infringement — Attenuating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure)

    OJ C 141, 20.6.2009, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.6.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 141/37


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2009 — Itochu v Commission

    (Case T-12/03) (1)

    (Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for video games consoles and games cartridges compatible with Nintendo games consoles - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Limitation of parallel exports - Attributability of the infringement - Fines - Differential treatment - Deterrent effect - Duration of the infringement - Attenuating circumstances - Cooperation during the administrative procedure)

    2009/C 141/74

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Itochu Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: Y. Shibasaki G. van Gerven, T. Franchoo, lawyers)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by P. Hellström and O. Beynet, and subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre and O. Beynet, Agents)

    Re:

    Application for the annulment of Articles 1, 3 and 5 of Commission Decision 2003/675/EC of 30 October 2002 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/35.587 PO Video Games, COMP/35.706 PO Nintendo Distribution and COMP/36.321 Omega — Nintendo) (OJ 2003 L 255, p. 33), in so far as they relate to the applicant, or, in the alternative, reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on it.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Itochu Corp. to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 55, 8.3.2003.


    Top