Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006FA0130

    Case F-130/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 Sotgia v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Appointment — Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials — Candidates’ names included on a reserve list before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules — Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

    OJ C 246, 11.9.2010, p. 40–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.9.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 246/40


    Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 Sotgia v Commission

    (Case F-130/06) (1)

    (Staff cases - Officials - Appointment - Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials - Candidates’ names included on a reserve list before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules - Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

    2010/C 246/69

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Stefano Sotgia (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: initially, T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers, and subsequently T. Bontinck and S. Woog, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and H Krämer, agents)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority which took effect on 16 April 2006 and by which the applicant, a member of temporary staff classified in grade A*11 who was successful in open competition EPSO/A/18/04, was appointed as an official classified in Grade A*6, step 2, in accordance with Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Tribunal:

    1.

    Dismisses the application.

    2.

    Orders each party to bear their own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 86.


    Top