Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TA0143

    Case T-143/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v Commission (Subsidies — Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 — Definitive countervailing duty — Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 — Price undercutting — Price pressure — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Causal link — Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution — Less than adequate remuneration — Income or price support — Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Benefit — Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Direct transfer of funds — Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 — Calculation of the amount of the benefit — Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Threat of material injury — Rights of the defence)

    OJ C 63, 20.2.2023, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.2.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 63/33


    Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v Commission

    (Case T-143/20) (1)

    (Subsidies - Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 - Definitive countervailing duty - Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 - Price undercutting - Price pressure - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Causal link - Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution - Less than adequate remuneration - Income or price support - Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Benefit - Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Direct transfer of funds - Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 - Calculation of the amount of the benefit - Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Threat of material injury - Rights of the defence)

    (2023/C 63/40)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicants: PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri (Medan, Indonesia), PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo (Medan) (represented by: F. Graafsma, J. Cornelis and E. Rogiest, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Kienapfel, G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

    Intervener in support of the defendant: European Biodiesel Board (EBB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M.-S. Dibling and L. Amiel, lawyers)

    Re:

    By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 of 28 November 2019 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia (OJ 2019 L 317, p. 42), in so far as that regulation concerns them.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.


    Top