Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020CA0013

    Case C-13/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Top System SA v Belgian State (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Legal protection of computer programs — Directive 91/250/EEC — Article 5 — Exceptions to the restricted acts — Acts necessary to enable the lawful purchaser to correct errors — Concept — Article 6 — Decompilation — Conditions)

    OJ C 490, 6.12.2021, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.12.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 490/8


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Top System SA v Belgian State

    (Case C-13/20) (1)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Copyright and related rights - Legal protection of computer programs - Directive 91/250/EEC - Article 5 - Exceptions to the restricted acts - Acts necessary to enable the lawful purchaser to correct errors - Concept - Article 6 - Decompilation - Conditions)

    (2021/C 490/05)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Top System SA

    Defendant: Belgian State

    Operative part of the judgment

    1.

    Article 5(1) of Council Directive 91/250/EEC of 14 May 1991 on the legal protection of computer programs must be interpreted as meaning that the lawful purchaser of a computer program is entitled to decompile all or part of that program in order to correct errors affecting its operation, including where the correction consists in disabling a function that is affecting the proper operation of the application of which that program forms a part;

    2.

    Article 5(1) of Directive 91/250 must be interpreted as meaning that the lawful purchaser of a computer program who wishes to decompile that program in order to correct errors affecting the operation thereof is not required to satisfy the requirements laid down in Article 6 of that directive. However, that purchaser is entitled to carry out such a decompilation only to the extent necessary to effect that correction and in compliance, where appropriate, with the conditions laid down in the contract with the holder of the copyright in that program.


    (1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.


    Top