C:2012:098:TOC

Document C:2012:098:TOC

Help

Official Journal of the European Union, C 98, 31 March 2012

Display all documents published in this Official Journal

HTML

PDF

		ISSN 1977-091X doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.098.eng
Official Journal of the European Union		C 98

English edition	Information and Notices	Volume 55 31 March 2012

Notice No	Contents	page
	IV Notices
	NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
	Court of Justice of the European Union
2012/C 098/01	Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 89, 24.3.2012	1

	V Announcements
	COURT PROCEEDINGS
	Court of Justice
2012/C 098/02	Joined Cases C-191/09 P and C-200/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 February 2012 — Council of the European Union (C-191/09 P), European Commission (C-200/09 P) v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT), formerly Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant ‘Niko Tube’ ZAT, Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT), formerly Nizhnedneprovsky Tube-Rolling Plant VAT (Appeals — Anti-dumping duties — Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 — Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(10)(i), Article 3(2), (3) and (5) to (7), Article 18(3) and Article 19(3) — Calculation of the normal value and of the injury — ‘Single economic entity’ — Rights of the defence — No statement of reasons)	2

2012/C 098/03	Case C-204/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Flachglas Torgau GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Aarhus Convention — Directive 2003/4/EC — Access to environmental information — Bodies or institutions acting in a legislative capacity — Confidentiality of the proceedings of public authorities — Condition that the confidentiality must be provided for by law)	2

2012/C 098/04	Case C-17/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně — Czech Republic) — Toshiba Corporation and Others v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Competition — Cartel, in the territory of a Member State, which commenced before the accession of that State to the European Union — Cartel of international scope having effects in the territory of the Union and the European Economic Area — Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Prosecution and sanction of the infringement for the period prior to the date of accession and the period following that date — Fines — Delimitation of the powers of the Commission and those of the national competition authorities — Imposition of fines by the Commission and by the national competition authority — Ne bis in idem principle — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Articles 3(1) and 11(6) — Consequences of the accession of a new Member State to the Union)	3

2012/C 098/05	Joined Cases C-72/10 and C-77/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Marcello Costa (C-72/10), Ugo Cifone (C-77/10) (Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Betting and gaming — Collection of bets on sporting events — Licensing requirement — Consequences of an infringement of European Union law in the awarding of licences — Award of 16 300 additional licences — Principle of equal treatment and the obligation of transparency — Principle of legal certainty — Protection of holders of earlier licences — National legislation — Mandatory minimum distances between betting outlets — Whether permissible — Cross-border activities analogous to those engaged in under the licence — Prohibition under national legislation — Whether permissible)	4

2012/C 098/06	Case C-182/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (formerly Cour d’arbitrage) (Belgium)) — Marie-Noëlle Solvay and Others v Région wallonne (Assessment of the effects of projects on the environment — Concept of legislative act — Force and effect of the guidance in the Aarhus Convention Implementation Guide — Consent for a project given without an appropriate assessment of its effects on the environment — Access to justice in environmental matters — Extent of the right to a review procedure — Habitats Directive — Plan or project affecting the integrity of the site — Imperative reason of overriding public interest)	5

2012/C 098/07	Case C-360/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel — Belgium) — Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) v Netlog NV (Information society — Copyright — Internet — Hosting service provider — Processing of information stored on an online social networking platform — Introducing a system for filtering that information in order to prevent files being made available which infringe copyright — No general obligation to monitor stored information)	6

2012/C 098/08	Case C-372/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Pak-Holdco sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu, (Taxation — Indirect taxes on the raising of capital — Capital duty levied on capital companies — Obligation on a Member State to take account of directives which were no longer in force at the time of that State’s accession — Exclusion, from the amount on which capital duty is charged, of the amount of the assets belonging to the capital company which are allocated to the increase in capital and which have already been subjected to capital duty)	7

2012/C 098/09	Case C-488/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Alicante — Spain) — Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional SA v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos SL (Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 19(1) — Community designs — Infringement or threatened infringement — Definition of ‘third parties’)	8

2012/C 098/10	Case C-594/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — T.G. van Laarhoven v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Sixth VAT Directive — Right to deduct input tax — Limitation — Use of goods forming part of the assets of a business for the private use of the taxable person — Fiscal treatment of private use of goods that are assets of the business)	8

2012/C 098/11	Case C-25/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação SA v Fazenda Pública (Taxation — Sixth VAT Directive — Deduction of input tax — Article 17(2) and (5) and Article 19 — ‘Subsidies’ used for the purchase of goods and services — Restriction of the right to deduct)	9

2012/C 098/12	Case C-118/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria)) — Eon Aset Menidjmunt v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168 and 176 — Right of deduction — Condition relating to use of goods and services for the purposes of taxed transactions — Origin of the right to deduct — Motor vehicle leasing contract — Financial leasing contract — Vehicle used by employer to transport free of charge an employee between his home and his workplace)	9

2012/C 098/13	Case C-134/11: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Jürgen Blödel-Pawlik v HanseMerkur Reiseversicherung AG (Directive 90/314/EEC — Package travel, package holidays and package tours — Article 7 — Protection against the risk of insolvency or bankruptcy on the part of the package organiser — Scope — Insolvency of the organiser on account of its fraudulent use of the funds transferred by consumers)	10

2012/C 098/14	Case C-636/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 9 December 2011 — Karl Berger v Freistaat Bayern	10

2012/C 098/15	Case C-2/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 3 January 2012 — Trianon Productie BV, other party: Revillon Chocolatier SAS	10

2012/C 098/16	Case C-5/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Lleida (Spain) lodged on 3 January 2012 — Marc Betriu Montull v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)	11

2012/C 098/17	Case C-11/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands), lodged on 4 January 2012 — Maatschap L.A. and Others v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie	12

2012/C 098/18	Case C-17/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 16 January 2012 — TVI Televisão Independente SA v Fazenda Pública	12

2012/C 098/19	Case C-18/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 16 January 2012 — Město Žamberk v Finanční ředitelství v Hradci Králové	12

2012/C 098/20	Case C-20/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 16 January 2012 — Elodie Giersch, Benjamin Marco Stemper, Julien Taminiaux, Xavier Renaud Hodin and Joëlle Hodin v State of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg	13

2012/C 098/21	Case C-21/12 P: Appeal brought on 16 January 2012 by Abbott Laboratories against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 November 2011 in Case T-363/10 Abbott Laboratories v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)	13

2012/C 098/22	Case C-22/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 17 January 2012 — Katarína Hassová v Rastislav Petrík, Blanka Holingová	14

2012/C 098/23	Case C-24/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 18 January 2012 — X BV, other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën	15

2012/C 098/24	Case C-26/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Leeuwarden (Netherlands), lodged on 18 January 2012 — fiscale eenheid PPG Holdings BV c.s. v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Noord/kantoor Groningen	16

2012/C 098/25	Case C-27/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 19 January 2012 — TBG Limited, other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën	16

2012/C 098/26	Case C-29/12: Action brought on 20 January 2012 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany	16

2012/C 098/27	Case C-30/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 23 January 2012 — Valeria Marcinová v Pohotovosť, s.r.o.	17

2012/C 098/28	Case C-32/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia (Badajoz, Spain) lodged on 23 January 2012 — Soledad Duarte Hueros v Autociba S.A., Automóviles Citroen España S.A.	17

2012/C 098/29	Case C-42/12 P: Appeal brought on 27 January 2012 by Václav Hrbek against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 November 2011 in Case T-434/10: Václav Hrbek v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)	17

2012/C 098/30	Case C-43/12: Action brought on 30 January 2012 — European Commission v European Parliament and Council of the European Union	18

2012/C 098/31	Case C-47/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 31 January 2012 — Kronos International Inc. v Finanzamt Leverkusen	19

2012/C 098/32	Case C-51/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Xiamie Zhu and Others	19

2012/C 098/33	Case C-52/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Ion Beregovoi	20

2012/C 098/34	Case C-53/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Hai Feng Sun	20

2012/C 098/35	Case C-54/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy) lodged on 2 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Liung Hong Yang	21

	General Court
2012/C 098/36	Case T-658/11: Action brought on 20 December 2011 — Commission v OHIM — Ten ewiv (TEN)	22

2012/C 098/37	Case T-23/12: Action brought on 17 January 2012 — MAF v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority	22

2012/C 098/38	Case T-25/12: Action brought on 17 January 2012 — 3M Pumps v OHIM — 3M (3M Pumps)	23

2012/C 098/39	Case T-42/12: Action brought on 1 February 2012 — Bateni v Council	23

2012/C 098/40	Case T-45/12: Action brought on 27 January 2012 — United Kingdom v ECB	24

2012/C 098/41	Case T-46/12: Action brought on 1 February 2012 — Chrysamed Vertrieb v OHIM — Chrysal International (Chrysamed)	25

2012/C 098/42	Case T-60/12: Action brought on 06 February 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission	26

2012/C 098/43	Case T-61/12: Action brought on 6 February 2012 — ABC-One v OHIM (SLIM BELLY)	26

2012/C 098/44	Case T-63/12: Action brought on 13 February 2012 — Oil Turbo Compressor v Council	27

2012/C 098/45	Case T-64/12: Action brought on 15 February 2012 — Henkel and Henkel France v Commission	28

Top